Our experiences shape us. We can agree on that, right?
And as much as we’d like to think we learnrn from the mistakes of others, the truth is… most of us don’t. We learnrn “the hard way,” through our own personal trials and tribulations.
Financially, the lessons we learnrn from the school of hard knocks are costly!
I’m not only talking about dollars and cents. I mean “costly” in the sense that financial lessons learnrned the hard way often rob us of years, even decades, of our precious time. They set us back… prevent us from reaching our full potential… from living life to the fullest.
Most costly of all, financial lessons and mistakes will rob millions of Americans of the opportunity to retire and live comfortably through their golden years.
The stats are mind-blowingly dim…
“Thirty-six percent of American workers age 55 to 64 say they have less than $25,000 in retirement savings.” — Employee Benefit Research Institute
“Fifty-one percent of households are at risk of not having enough savings to maintain their standard of living after retirement.” — The Center for Retirement Research at Boston College
“Sixty-six percent of Americans said their top financial concernrn was not having enough money for retirement.” — Gallup poll
But beyond the research and statistics, I’ve seen this retirement dilemma first hand. And it’s that experience that shaped the way I approach investing in the markets…
The year was 2008.
I was working as an advisor for a Fortune 500 financial planning firm. Each week, I met with dozens of families. Their stories were all different, yet all the same.
Simply put: the goal, for each, was to get to 65 with a nut big enough to last. (Although what that meant — How big? How long? And HOW!? — no one seemed to know.)
My analysis usually showed a shortfall in savings. Roughly 80% of our clients were behind the curve.
The obstacles to saving enough were similar… the kids’ college took priority, or an aging parent needed more help than anticipated. Basically, “life” got in the way.
Worse still, I learnrned that most well-intentioned Americans have no clue how to manage long-term investments. And that’s why they hire professionals. But that’s a problem, too.
You see, even though I was a professional (a licensed financial advisor), I was expected to toe the company line and only recommend strategies and investments that were “pre-approved,” more or less.
Most of the time, that advice centered on “traditional” investment tenets: dollar-cost averaging (read: buying a little more each month), buy-and-hold (err, more like “buy-and-hope!”), asset allocation (but just long stocks and bonds).
The odd thing, to me, was that our recommendations in 2008 weren’t all that different from all the years prior. The state of the market seemed to make no difference.
Basically, the buy-and-hold mantra was dutifully repeated as the S&P 500 lost, from its October 2007 peak, 15% by March 2008… 20% by July 2008… 42% by October 2008… and a full 50% by November 2008.
And the entire time, I had a sense that there must be a better way.
So every lunch hour, instead of taking large groups of potential clients out for free meals (as my boss expected me to), I sat in my car, ate a sandwich, and read everything I could find about non-traditional investment strategies.
Thousands of pages later, I came away with two realizations.
The first is that “passive” investing is risky. It requires the investor to give away too much control to the whims of the market.
The second is that you have to play both sides of the market. Looking only to the long side (i.e. buying) is a double-whammy that limits profit opportunities and increases risk.
It was precisely long-only, passive investing that my firm pitched, so we were at odds. I packed up my boxes and bobble-head in early 2009 to join a proprietary trading firm run by two accomplished hedge fund managers.
During my interview for that job, I naively asked: “Did you guys lose less than the market last year?”
I got a hard stare in returnrn.
“We made money last year.”
Somehow, even after insulting my interviewer, I got the job.
Of course, the thought of making money in 2008 only solidified my suspicions about passive, long-only investing. And over the next year, I learnrned the “better way” that I knew was hiding beneath the pile of traditional investment advice.
I won’t bore you today with all the gory details about non-traditional investment strategies. I know, as my wife kindly reminds me, that “they’re pretty esoteric and not all that interesting to everyone.”
My only goal today is this: to spur you to make a proactive decision about your financial future. Today. Not tomorrow, or some day. Right this minute.
The good news is, you don’t have to “go it alone.” For years now, I’ve been helping Dent Research subscribers take control of their accounts, through the research I provide in my services, Cycle 9 Alert and Max Profit Alert.
There’s no guesswork involved… I tell you exactly what to buy and sell. But only YOU can decide to make the commitment to reach your financial goals…
I personally think you’d be better off taking the bull by the hornrns…
To leave passive, long-only investing a distant memory…
And to learnrn more about my approach to active investing.
It’s an approach that works to limit risk, protect capital, and grow investment portfolios. And, in my opinion, it’s the only way to avoid wealth-demolishing years, like 2008.
Eight years ago, I vowed to do better for my clients the next time another 2008 rolled around. And while I don’t try to predict exactly when the next market crash will unfold, I have spent the past decade preparing a strategy that is fit to not only weather the storm, but also provide great opportunities to grow your wealth while everyone else is floundering.
Adam O’Dell, CMT
Chief Investment Strategist, Dent Research